LaTonia Wright; nurse, attorney, advocate

Nurses in the Greater Cincinnati/Tristate area (Kentucky-Ohio-Indiana) have a real gem in their midst. I'm talking about LaTonia Wright, CEO of the Law Offic of LaTonia Denise Wright, LLC. She's a registered nurse in Ohio, and an attorney licensed to practice law in K-O-I. She specializes in license defense for nurses, but also provides workplace consultations and other services to nurses (in her own words...Representing, Counseling, and Advising Nurses).

What makes her special, at least to this graying, recovering nurse anesthetist, is how she "gets it" when it comes to the disease of chemical dependence. While a majority of our society, including health care providers, believe someone with active addiction is "choosing" to continue using drugs (including alcohol), LaTonia understands they are ill and require effective, evidence based treatment. She also understands the public must be protected from nurses who are not practicing safe nursing, for whatver reason. She wants to be sure the public is protected while assuring the rights of the nurse impaired by this disease are also protected.

In other words, she does her best to assure a win-win situation takes place...the public continues to receive the best care from competent nursing professionals, while the nurse with a chronic, progressive, potentially fatal disease receives the care needed to save their life and possibly their career.

Thank you, LaTonia, for treating nurses struggling with this disease with respect and compassion. And for advocating for their rights...to life (in recovery), liberty, and the pursuit of happiness...which can only happen when the disease is in remission.

Criminal and License Defense

Whenever I'm contacted by a nurse facing criminal charges related to impairment, the first question I ask is;

"Do you have a criminal defense attorney?"

As many of you have most likely answered...Well, duh! Of COURSE I do! Do you think I'm dumb enough to defend myself in court? No, I don't thing so, but there ARE a few who actually consider it.

I receive even more inquires about pending investigations by the board of nursing. Again, the first question I ask the person contacting me is:

"Do you have a LICENSE defense attorney?"

Here are the top three answers I receive to that question:

1. No, it's only the board of nursing. It's not like I'm going to prison or anything.
2. I'm a nurse facing nurses, I know how to defend myself.
3. I can't afford an attorney. Besides, it's the board of nursing, not the judges at Nuremberg.

Let me put it to you this way, there is nothing more serious you'll face in the profession of nursing than an inquiry, investigation, and/or a hearing before the licensure board. If you make a mistake...you may never practice nursing again!

This is why a nurse should purchase professional liability insurance with a licensure defense clause...as soon as you graduate from nursing school! If you don't have one now...GET ONE ASAP!!!! It's cheap compared to all the doo doo you'll face if you need one and don't have it.

I've been charged with a felony, now what?

Need a license defense attorney? Contact the American Association of Nurse Attorneys

Professional Liability for Nurses

Addicts in health professions flock to get peers' help

This article perpetuates many of the most prominent myths associated with the disease of addiction without even realizing that's what they're doing.

Just a few examples:

"Until the late 1970s, drug addiction in the health care industry was largely addressed punitively. Licenses were revoked, careers crushed and addicts jailed. That made doctors, nurses, dentists and pharmacists reluctant to confess addiction or pursue help, further endangering patients. Even now, when addiction is better understood as a disease, health workers fear coming forward."

That's STILL the way many states continue to handle impaired health care providers. They have a "Program on the books", but even if a person meets all the inclusion criteria and also clears the criteria for exclusion from the program, the board can still refuse to admit the provider if they "feel" they might not do well. That's the problem...we need to stop dealing with this disease with feelings and begin using science and evidence based practices. Yes, addicts can do some terrible things as a result of their disease, but if we can remove the stigma, maybe we can intervene and get them into treatment BEFORE they get to the point of committing illegal acts.

"It is extremely difficult to acknowledge because it is admitting to human frailty, and we as health care professionals are held to a higher standard," said Elizabeth Pace, chief executive of Peer Assistance."

Is having cancer a human frailty? Is having diabetes or heart disease a human frailty? This statement is nothing more than being judgmental and assigning blame and lack of willpower to the person with a medical disease that CAUSES the inability to just stop using. This is the very condescending and judgmental attitude that prevents people from seeking help.

Addicts are not bad people trying to become good! They are ill with a chronic, progressive and unnecessarily fatal disease and are trying to become well!

"I didn't understand I had a disease," she said. "I thought I was bad and I had let down my entire profession. I had let the world down. I really thought my punishment should be that I should die."

This is one of the correct things published in this article. Every addict feels this way...not just health care professionals. Society perpetuates this incorrect and unscientific "belief". Once you read the research and the science, looking at it as a lack of will power makes no sense.

"Experts say crushing the stigma of addiction starts with education in medical, dental, nursing and pharmacy schools."

Yes it does. And using scientific terms instead of emotion laden judgment filled words and phrases in the press coverage will also be required to change the cultural acceptance that addiction is NOT a disease.

"That education should also be directed at hospital administrators, who sometimes must choose between quietly firing a pill-plundering employee or calling for help, which can lead to public scrutiny."

There is a great example of using negative emotional words instead of scientific or neutral language. Gee, I wonder what the not so hidden agenda this writer holds when it comes to the disease of addiction in health care providers?

"There are probably people alive right now because some hospital administrators had the guts to say we are going to call in an airstrike on ourselves and fix this problem the right way," said Jeff Sweetin, agent in charge for theDrug Enforcement Administration's Rocky Mountain region."

Typical attitude of a police agency...we have to bring an air-strike in order to eliminate these horrible addicts. We certainly wouldn't want to treat the disease now would we. Of course not, it might cost them their jobs.

"We always ask (the addicted health care worker who just got "busted" instead of diagnosed) what we can tell the hospital to make their system better, and that typically leads to changes in the system."

The biggest change that needs to happen in the system is to start treting this as the disease that it is, not some lack of willpower or moral failing. Until THAT happens, not much is going to change.

Wealth, fame, and addiction

George Carlin (or Robin Williams, depending on the source) said it well,

"Drugs (cocaine) are God's way of telling you that you make too much money."

We are seeing that very thing played out with Michael Jackson. It's one glaring example of the progressive nature of the disease. Mr. Jackson had 2 things that allowed him to continue using mood altering substances until it finally killed him...

• money
• sycophantic enablers (fawning parasite; A servile self-seeker who attempts to win favor by flattering influential people)

By the very nature of the disease, an addict is incapable of stopping by their own force of will. This is why some sort of intervention is required to get them into treatment. Once they detox and their brain begins to recuperate, THEN the education and techniques provided by evidence-based treatment can actually be retained and used to stay "clean".

Intervention takes many forms. The most common type is what we see on the A&E television show "Intervention". It's a technique used to create a "bottom", that magical place and time where the addict will enter treatment. For an addict with unlimited resources and surrounded by people who will give them whatever they want, that bottom is death.

Intervention is difficult. It appears to go against all definitions of love and logic. But continuing to "rescue" the addict from the consequences of their drug misuse allows them to continue to believe they are in control. The longer it takes to get the person into treatment, the more the disease progresses and the tougher it becomes to effectively treat the disease. When you are surrounded by people who want to please you just to be near you, the intervention is unlikely to take place. Or, if someone tries to make it happen, the sycophantic enablers sabotage the very thing designed to help the addict.

Yes, there has been unethical, unprofessional, and undoubtedly criminal activity involved in the death of Mr. Jackson. However, the medical providers aren't the only people to be held accountable (although I have no doubt that's exactly what will happen). Mr. Jackson's family and employees share that responsibility as well.

I hope Mr. Jackson's life is studied closely in order to learn the valuable lessons it holds. While he was an unparalleled entertainer with unlimited talent, his troubled life and premature death could provide the positive move forward when dealing with all apsects of the disease called addiction.

Professional Liability Insurance for Nurses

As a recovery mentor, peer advisor, and consulant, I frequently come in contact with nurses who rely solely on their employer for malpractice/liability insurance. I have to confess, I did the same thing for most of my time as an emergency room nurse and certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA). This makes no sense professionally.

An insurance company and the attorneys they provide if there is a claim have the interest of their client(s) first and foremost. If in the process of dealing with the claim it is in the best interest of the employer to hang the nurse out to dry, then that's what's going to happen. Then, the nurse will need to hire their own attorney and pay for them OUT OF POCKET, since the insurance they relied on covers the hospital, not them.

Professional liability insurance (which should include a license defense clause!) for nurses is extremely reasonable. The claim that "it's too expensive" is lame at best. The American Nurses Association (ANA) states ont their web site; "A must have for every nurse. Protect your career by purchasing your own coverage at a reasonable price. Every nurse today should carry their own professional liability insurance to protect themselves from the costs of legal and board of nursing action -- even if they are covered by their employer."

So why is it most nurses DON'T have their own insurance, and don't seem to understand the importance of having this insurance? Read the opinion of a nurse who is also a license defense attorney.

What do you think?

Brilliant, Free Marketing (and a little revenge)

This man is a genius! AND! Look at the free marketing while also taking on a huge airline! Anyone who has traveled extensively for business would love to do this to an airline who overbooked a flight (never could figure that one out), lost luggage, or had a body cavity search because you DON'T fit the terrorist (dare I say it?) PROFILE?

Several years ago I flew to Brownsville, Texas to provide a day long program at a hospital there. I had a layover in Dallas. I arrived in Brownsville while my luggage traveled to Oakland. My lecture material was in my checked luggage along with my suit and tie. I was assured the luggage would arrive at my hotel by 11:00pm.

It didn't. When my wake up call arrived at 5:00am, my luggage had not arrived from it's junket to the west coast. The hospital educator arrived at 6:30am to escort me to the hospital. When I met her in my polo shirt, jeans (yes, they were clean, but I had worn them the day before), and tennis shoes, she surmised something wasn't quite right. We stopped at a Kroger and picked up a razor, shave cream, and some deodorant (cheap hotel).

I did the presentation with 2 white boards and red, black, and green dry markers. It went OK. When I arrived at my hotel at 4:30pm, my luggage had JUST arrived! The airline said they would cover up to loss of $250.00. My speakers fee was significantly above that mark (not too significantly above). The airline informed me they wouldn't cover that loss if the client decided not to pay the full fee, even though it was their mistake that could have cost me a significant amount of money.

I wish You-Tube would have been around at the time. It would have been fun to extract some justice (and maybe even $$) as a result of the free marketing.

Michael Jackson, Addiction, the Media, and the Medical Profession

I've been following the Michael Jackson saga since the first news alert of his "possible" death. The first thing that went through my mind was he died from an accidental overdose. Little did I realize it would take us to the "propofol" thing. And while his death is tragic, so are the deaths of all addicts. They are tragic because many, many, MANY of them don't have to happen.

So why DO they continue to happen? And why do they appear to be increasing? Because our culture continues to follow the same failed ways of "dealing" with this "issue".

First of all, it's NOT an issue...it's a disease. Until we treat it that way, this kind of crap will keep happening more and more. "Dealing" with a disease in a punitive way...i.e., with the police department and jail instead of with interventions and treatment leads to continued progression of the disease and ultimately death.

"BUT TREATMENT DOESN'T WORK!"

Of course it does, when it's started as early as possible, is evidence based, and is ongoing. Currently, that doesn't happen in too many cases.

Why not? Because we approach this disease with what I call the "3 Ms" of addiction: Myth, Misbelief, and Misinformation. One of the predominant myths is known as "hitting rock bottom".

"Treatment doesn't work until the addict HITS ROCK BOTTOM!"

What is rock bottom? I'm sure there are numerous definitions. I think the most accepted one is this...the addict has to lose most (if not all) of the things that are important to them....job, marriage, family, money, car, etc. before they will be willing to enter treatment. But without an intervention of some kind...the bottom for all too many addicts is death.

Mr. Jackson is just one example of what happens when treatment is withheld until the addict "hits bottom".

Goodness, he even had a physician with him at the time of his death! It will be interesting to see what happened leading up to his death that day (if we ever really find out). But there are some clear things that DID happen.

First, Michael Jackson was surrounded by sycophants (self-seeking, servile flatterers; fawning parasites...according to dictionary.com). Some of these people were health care providers, some even (gasp) physicians! As you can see, doctors, nurses, pharmacists, etc. are not immune from all of this. There are star struck individuals in all walks of life, just as there are unethical people in all areas of business and government. When someone told Mr. Jackson no...he found someone who would say yes. My guess is the physician with Mr. Jackson at the time of his death thought he was skilled enough to prevent what happened. Guess what...MD doesn't automatically endow the person with the ability to manage an airway or prevent them from making a mistake in administering a medication they have no business administering. Combine that with administering this medication in a place where it should never be administered and you have the very situation on June 25th in his rented home.

Second, let's compare how we (meaning society and the medical community) approach other chronic, progressive, potentially fatal diseases.

Diabetes. We teach about the disease, that if there is a family history, the risk increases. We teach early signs and symptoms. We suggest early EARLY treatment, aggressive treatment, and evidence based treatment.

Cardiovascular disease. Early recognition of signs and symptoms. Immediate intervention at the first sign of possible heart attack or stroke. Get to the ER now! Education about prevention (family history, diet, exercise, check ups, etc.).

Cancer. Education about the disease, causes, risk factors...like family history (where have we heard that before?), early signs and symptoms, and early, aggressive treatment.

Addiction. How do we handle it? Don't talk about it. Ignore family history...hell, don't even THINK about talking about it! Ignore the early signs and symptoms (it's a phase, it's part of "growing up", they're in the "wrong crowd", they made "bad decisions" or "mistakes"), cover up the consequences for their "bad decisions" (called co-dependent behavior), and WAIT UNTIL THEY HIT BOTTOM. Does anyone see how completely crazy this is? Does anyone see how it makes absolutely no sense from a medical stand point? And yet we keep doing the same stupid stuff over and over hoping the outcome will be different. Didn't Einstein say that was INSANITY!?

If you don't see the idiocy, you're part of the problem. If you do see the idiocy and do nothing, you're part of the problem.

Several family members and friends have said over and over, "We tried to save Michael but we just couldn't. We did everything we could and it just wasn't enough."

BALONEY! Did they hire an interventionist? Did they require him to enter treatment and refuse to provide him with drugs? Did they hire recovering addicts to keep the sycophants away? Did they fire the doctors who were unethically and unprofessionally supplying him with addictive drugs?

Let's stop the insanity and actually start doing what needs to happen. Education, early recognition, intervention, aggressive treatment, and long term follow up...just like we do for other chronic, progressive, potentially fatal disease.

I hope Michael Jackson's death won't be in vain.

American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Warned of Propofol Dangers 3 Days Before Jackson's Death

Thank you to a good friend and colleague for writing this for publication on my blog.

PARKRIDGE, IL. The American Association of Nurse Anesthetists published a statement on June 22 warning of potentially fatal results when the anesthetic agent propofol (Diprivan) is abused, just 3 days before Michael Jackson died of a possible overdose of the drug. The association also warned that propofol has properties which make it a potential drug of abuse and addiction, Indeed reports of propofol abuse and fatal, accidental self administered overdose have been reported since 1992 and are on the increase. The majority of incidents of abuse are among health care providers since propofol is an intravenous medication which is use only inside hospitals, outpatient surgery centers and clinics. "Our concern has been growing over the ease of access to propofol within hospitals compared to other drugs of abuse like morphine. Most disturbing is a 30-50% incidence of fatal outcomes when this dangerous drug is abused. Propofol stops breathing, followed in 4-5 minutes with cardiac arrest due to lack of oxygen" says Greg Stocks CRNA, a peer assistance advisor at the association.

Propofol has no approved clinical use outside of health care institutions and is not available by prescription. It is never indicated for treatment of insomnia. Despite the potential for propofol abuse, it is not a drug controlled or restricted by the DEA and is treated no differently than antibiotics. Some hospitals and anesthesia departments have taken their own steps in securing and accounting for their supplies of propofol after it became clear to them that a high incidence of fatal overdose results from abuse.

See the AANA propofol Position Statement at www.aana.com

Propofol, Michael jackson, and ethics (or lack thereof)

More "mess" regarding propofol and Michael Jackson................

Michael Jackson: Aliases, Painkillers, Propofol & a "Mini-Clinic"

I don't think I'd want to be the folks involved in all of this "mess". Talk about unethical, unprofessional, unlawful, and any othe "un-" you can invent.

Video of Nurse Discussing Propofol Use by Michael Jackson

Video is at the end of the article at this link:

Jackson Begged for Sedative, Nurse Said.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/06/30/entertainment/main5126529.shtml

Michael Jackson's Death Might Change the Status of Propofol

Propofol (also known as a Diprivan) is a medication used to induce anesthesia for a variety of procedures. It's also not a controlled substance.

What does that mean?

It means it's not considered "dangerous". It means it has a "low abuse potential".

Those of us in the anesthesia profession, especially those of us who deal with professionals who are dealing with substance abuse and chemical dependence, have been trying to get propfol's status elevated to a controlled substance. This means it would be more difficult to obtain and misuse. The FDA and the DEA have continued to resist this change in status. The American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA found at www.aana.com) has just published (to their credit) Position Statement 2.14, "Securing Propofol".

Apparently, the deaths of anesthesia professionals aren't enough to change the minds of the FDA or DEA. Perhaps the death of Michael Jackson from a possible propofol overdose will change their minds. If so, his death will not have been in vain.

"Dangerous Drug Found in Jackson Home"
http://www.tmz.com/2009/07/01/michael-jackson-propofol-lidocaine-overdose-criminal/